The statement "Based on all the information, Hans Smedema argued that no fair trials can exist inside the Netherlands" is true!
No fair trial possible in the Netherlands
The statement "Based on all the information, Hans Smedema argued that no fair trials can exist inside the Netherlands" is true.- Hans Smedema states that " No fair trial [is] possible in the Netherlands because judges also have to ignore everything I state! " [1]
- He argues that during his trials for defamation, " no defense was ever allowed! Nothing, while a very simple DNA test proves that, for example, Rieks Perdok, who claims never to have had sex with my defenseless wife, is the father of our youngest son!" [1]
- Smedema also states that in his first trial, he was " convicted without preparation! One even walked away at the start of the hearing due to defamation." [1]
- During his appeal, Smedema says that " Again no defense [was] allowed, despite [a] request to hear 12 witnesses for the defense [...] Only the complainants are heard, so again pure fraud by the Court rats!" [2]
- He believes that the court is deliberately attempting to " keep the Royal House out of harm’s way " by not allowing a proper defense. [2]
- Smedema says that he was " drugged during the court case without legal representation! " as he was unknowingly taking an antipsychotic. [3]
- He was also told by an American judge that his case was " unique in American history " because he had five valid grounds for asylum. [4]
- Despite this, he was deported back to the Netherlands because there was not enough evidence to prove that the Dutch government was behind his persecution. [4]
- Smedema claims that after being deported from America, he was put in " innocent(!) detention for 13 months in the Netherlands " for "defamation of the rapists of my wife." [5]
- He believes that the Dutch government is using " State Security " as an excuse to prevent him from receiving legal assistance and having a fair trial. [5]
- Smedema has tried to get legal help, but " never succeeded! They all refuse, even when defending against defamation! " [1]
- Because Smedema is not allowed legal assistance, " everything I do is my own work! " [3]
Related info
The original passage highlights Hans Smedema's claims of being denied a fair trial in the Netherlands. The source material offers several points that expand on this idea:- Smedema's Case Deemed "Unique" in American History: Multiple sources emphasize that during his asylum requests in the US, Judge Rex J. Ford found his case to be "unique in American history" due to the presence of five valid grounds for asylum. This underscores the extraordinary nature of Smedema's allegations and suggests the possibility of a severe miscarriage of justice in the Netherlands.
- Allegations of State Security Abuse: Smedema consistently claims that the Dutch government invoked "State Security" as a justification to block investigations into his case, deny him access to legal assistance, and obstruct his attempts to obtain information. This points to a potential abuse of power and raises concerns about the transparency and accountability of the Dutch legal system.
- Details of Alleged Interference with Asylum Requests: The source material provides detailed accounts of Smedema's failed asylum attempts, including specific instances of alleged interference by the Dutch government. This strengthens his claim of being deliberately persecuted and denied fair treatment, with implications extending beyond the Dutch borders.
Based on the written legal Statements of
Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful 'El Albir', Costa Blanca, Spain