← Terug naar het Hoofdarchief

Official EU Commission Complaint Regarding Systemic Breach of EU Law by the Dutch Ministry of Justice

Gepubliceerd: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 | Categorie/Type: post | Auteur: Hans Smedema

Official EU Commission Complaint Regarding Systemic Breach of EU Law by the Dutch Ministry of Justice

Text of the Complaint on April 28, 2025

Confirmation of this complaint has been received with a reference number.

Subject: Complaint Regarding Systemic Breach of EU Law by the Dutch Ministry of Justice

Description of Facts & EU Laws Violated:

For decades, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) of the Netherlands has engaged in systemic corruption and obstruction of justice, fundamentally undermining the EU legal order. This constitutes a practice by a national authority contrary to EU law. The Hans Smedema Affair serves as a core example exposing these alleged systemic failures, detailing decades-long obstruction orchestrated from within the MoJ, involving former Secretary-General Joris D., to conceal crimes and protect perpetrators. This involved abuse of a Royal Special Decree and manipulation of international treaties, creating ethical/legal dilemmas for those involved like manipulated bribed Family, UN, America, Spain, Mexico, Canada, France, Germany, Queen Juliana/Beatrix, PM Balkenende, King WA, Pres. Obama/Biden and Asylum Judge Rex J. F.

Actions Demonstrating Systemic Failure (Illustrated by Smedema Affair):

This history of obstruction and evidence manipulation, exemplified by recent dismissive official responses (e.g., Minister van Weel, Feb 4, 2025 ) which disregard withheld evidence, raises serious concerns about the reliability of information provided by the implicated authorities.  

EU Law Violations: This systemic failure, exemplified by the huge Smedema case, constitutes a serious and persistent breach of:

  1. Article 2 TEU (Rule of Law): The MoJ actions (abuse of power, obstruction, use of decrees, inequality) fundamentally contradict legality, legal certainty, judicial control, and equality.  
  2. Article 19(1) TEU (Effective Judicial Protection): The Dutch state fails its obligation by allowing MoJ interference (blocking investigations, denying legal aid, compromising independence) essential for applying EU law.  
  3. Article 47 CFR (Right to Effective Remedy & Fair Trial): Systemic MoJ interference, manipulation (e.g., alleged ECHR and EU Parlement Complaint dossier), and obstruction deny citizens access to an independent tribunal and effective remedy.  
  4. Article 325 TFEU & PIF Directive (2017/1371): MoJ obstruction and compromised judiciary prevent effective investigation/prosecution of potential corruption/fraud affecting EU interests.  
  5. EU Anti-Corruption Principles: The conduct (abuse of function, obstruction of justice, cover-up network) aligns with offences targeted by EU standards.  
  6. Principle of Mutual Trust: The compromised justice system demonstrated erodes the mutual trust necessary for judicial cooperation within the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ).  
Impact: This situation represents a systemic threat to the EU's legal foundations, violates fundamental rights, jeopardizes the EU budget, and hinders essential EU cooperation. Furthermore, the alleged pattern of evidence suppression risks compromising the integrity of the Member State's cooperation with the Commission's investigation into this complaint. It requires urgent assessment and action by the Commission.  

Solution: 

  1. Independent UNCAT investigation or equal.
  2. Order Dutch State Attorney Office 'Pels Rijcken' Arbitrage(!) Department as Legal help for State/Hans Smedema. Arbitrage will make this case solvable in weeks, and keep manipulated coerced People/Countries free from prosecution.
A direct special request for Evidence with room for 2 files no larger than 2 Mb during the filing of my complaint..., so unprepared added were these 2 files in PDF:

Dutch EU Membership Rules and Laws Consistently Violated by Joris Demmink with other Ministries Corruptly Included since 1972!

Smedema Allegations: Dutch Conspiracy and Obstruction with People Involved

*****************************

I immediately received a copy of this Complaint with a reference number, which I sent to Geert Wilders, AIVD, John van den Heuvel, Bestuur Politiebond.nl and Hans van Wijk of Pels Rijcken Arbitrage team.

And on May 15, 2025 it was officially Registered, but received on May 22! But with this negative reaction:

European Commission Unit C.4 – Democracy, Anti-Corruption, Union Citizenship and Free Movement Denies Huge State Capture Case!

Google Gemini Advanced 2.5 Pro Deep Research and Google NotebookLM Plus with the huge Hans Smedema Affair,

Investigating Smedema's Allegations: Dutch Justice and Conspiracy Claims

based on the legal-written-statements on this Blog and e-books by victim Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile since 2008 surviving in beautiful 'El Albir', Costa Blanca, Spain

OFFICIAL EVIDENCE VAULT & LEGAL ARCHIVE
Protected under U.S. Federal Jurisdiction, UNCAT Proceedings & Constitutional Freedom of Speech.