Briefing Document: The Hans Smedema Affair!

Executive Summary

The Hans Smedema Affair, as detailed across the provided sources, presents a disturbing and complex narrative of alleged systemic abuse, corruption, and obstruction of justice within the Netherlands, dating back to 1972 and continuing to the present day. Hans Smedema and his wife, Wietske (Wies) Jansma, claim to be victims of horrific crimes, including forced drugging, sexual abuse, rape, and illegal sterilization, all allegedly facilitated by a sophisticated and deeply entrenched "cover-up" involving high-ranking officials, medical professionals, judicial authorities, intelligence services, and even the Dutch Royal House.

A central theme is the "Kafkaesque trap" in which Smedema finds himself: systematically denied legal representation, access to justice, and information, making it seemingly impossible for him to pursue his case through conventional channels. The sources allege a deliberate state-engineered obstruction where the obstruction itself constitutes the core violation of fundamental rights and EU law. This case, often compared to the infamous Dreyfus Affair due to its alleged state-level cover-up, highlights profound concerns about the Dutch government's commitment to the rule of law, transparency, and accountability, and its potential impact on mutual trust within the EU.

Key Themes and Most Important Ideas/Facts

1. Allegations of Horrific Crimes and Trauma (1972-Present)

Forced Drugging and Sexual Abuse: The core of the complaint centers on Hans Smedema's wife, Wies, being "drugged (with the precursor of the party drug GHB) and raped for over a year (1972) and, through the trauma (intentionally and with a stun gun), was turned into a so-called 'sex slave'." (1Politie.doc.pdf, p. 2) Hans Smedema was also allegedly drugged, leading to 28 years of repression and memory loss. (1Politie.doc.pdf, p. 2) The perpetrator, Jan van Beek, allegedly used hypnosis and force, and later confessed that making her a "sex slave" was "much cheaper and simpler." (1Politie.doc.pdf, p. 2) This abuse allegedly continued for years, with Wies being "used for making films" and "made available to others for money." (1Politie.doc.pdf, p. 2)
Dissociative Identity and Amnesia: Wies developed a "double personality" (sekslavin, maar dan echt) and currently "still knows nothing" about the abuse. (1Politie.doc.pdf, p. 1) Smedema himself experienced "amnesia" and "repression" for 28 years until his memory returned in March 2000 through "flashbacks." (1Politie.doc.pdf, p. 2) The denial by family and others has allegedly led to "wrong and damaging treatment based on lies" for Smedema. (1Politie.doc.pdf, p. 1)
Illegal Sterilization and Children from Rapists: Smedema alleges he was "secretly illegally sterilized" in 1972 by Jan van Beek to prevent him from having children with Wies, while "three children from 3 rapists" were conceived with Wies and their paternity was hidden from Smedema through falsified DNA tests. (CATComplaint-FormWebversie.pdf, p. 4; European_Parliament_Chair_of_the_Committee_on.pdf, p. 2; Supplement-B-Form-IWebversie (1).doc.pdf, p. 5)
Ongoing Abuse and Threats: The abuse reportedly continued through individuals aware of Wies's "slave" situation, including a neighbor and "good friend." (1Politie.doc.pdf, p. 2; Analyse van de dissociatieve verschijnselen.doc.pdf, p. 1) There were also alleged attempts to murder Smedema via drug overdose in 1975/76 and the alleged secret murder of a neighbor, Cees van 't Hoog, who "came too close to the truth." (1Politie.doc.pdf, p. 3; Results of US FBI Investigation into Hans Smedema Affair - Hans Smedema Affair, p. 1)
Secret Drugging and Electroshock Torture: Smedema claims he was secretly administered "powerful antipsychotic medication, disguised as harmless 'baby aspirin'" since 2003, confirmed in 2022 in a Spanish hospital, aiming to incapacitate him. (The Smedema Affair: Dutch Injustice in Spain, p. 5) He also alleges "secretly forced criminal electroshock torture" in Spain in 2008 and 2010 by Professor Onno van der Hart and Jaap Duijs, with a retired police officer reportedly intervening in one instance. (The Smedema Affair: Dutch Injustice in Spain, p. 5)

2. Alleged Systemic Obstruction and Cover-up by Dutch Authorities

"Cordon Sanitaire" and State Capture: Smedema alleges a "horrific cover-up" or "Cordon Sanitaire" orchestrated by the "State of Netherlands, Ministry of Justice, Family, Medical Professionals, Police, Intelligence Services" since 1972, aimed at "forbidding of investigations/prosecutions" and "forcing silence on involved parties." (Assessment of the Dutch National Ombudsman’s Refusal to Investigate the Hans Smedema Affair – Hans Smedema Affair, p. 2) This is framed as "State Capture," where private interests (e.g., those of the perpetrators and complicit officials) influence state decision-making to their benefit and conceal corrupt activities. (EU Law, State Capture Allegations, p. 1)
Refusal of Investigations and Legal Aid:Police and Public Prosecution Service: Police allegedly refused to file official reports in 2000 and 2004, calling the story "too bizarre and unbelievable." (CATComplaint-FormWebversie.pdf, p. 3; Supplement-B-Form-IWebversie (1).doc.pdf, p. 6) Prosecutor Ruud Rosingh was reportedly "forced to stop" an investigation into Wies's rape in 1991 and transferred, with the case being appealed on "state security." (fighting-the-unknown-part-4-asylum-denied.pdf, p. 3; Timeline Crucial Criminal Events! – Hans Smedema Affair.pdf, p. 1)
Lawyers: Smedema states that "No lawyers are willing or allowed to help me legally" since 2004, despite repeated attempts, suggesting they are "forced by the appeal for the state security." (CATComplaint-FormWebversie.pdf, p. 3; Supplement-B-Form-IWebversie (1).doc.pdf, p. 6) This creates a "chicken or egg situation" where he needs a lawyer to compel the state, but the state allegedly prevents him from securing one. (Assessment of the Dutch National Ombudsman’s Refusal to Investigate the Hans Smedema Affair – Hans Smedema Affair, p. 3)
National Ombudsman: The National Ombudsman allegedly refused to investigate the case twice (2005, 2008), citing lack of competence due to alleged involvement of "The Crown." (The Smedema Affair: Dutch Injustice in Spain, p. 3)
Minister of Justice: In February 2025, the Dutch Minister of Justice, David van Weel, allegedly refused a request for legal representation, advising Smedema to "look for a Lawyer and first prove my case myself." (ECHRcomplaintGemini.pdf, p. 1)
Suppression and Falsification of Evidence:Frankfurt Dossier: A 30+ page Dutch intelligence file about Smedema and his wife, allegedly discovered at the 97th General Army Hospital in Frankfurt in 1983, was "corruptly deleted" within three days. (The Smedema Affair: Dutch Injustice in Spain, p. 3; NilsMelzerOHCHRsigned.pdf, p. 2)
Medical Records: Smedema alleges falsified DNA paternity tests in 2003, manipulated MRI scans in 2006, and coerced medical professionals to falsify files and misinform. (Assessment of the Dutch National Ombudsman’s Refusal to Investigate the Hans Smedema Affair – Hans Smedema Affair, p. 2; CATComplaint-FormWebversie.pdf, p. 4)
Other Evidence: Claims include the destruction of a photo showing Wies with Jaap Duijs and the deletion of 50 files related to the case by the Ministry of Justice and the AIVD. (The Smedema Affair: Dutch Injustice in Spain, p. 3)
Discrediting the Victim: Smedema claims he was intentionally portrayed as "schizophrenic/paranoid," leading to incorrect diagnoses and treatments. (Assessment of the Dutch National Ombudsman’s Refusal to Investigate the Hans Smedema Affair – Hans Smedema Affair, p. 2; fighting-the-unknown-part-2-impossible-flashbacks.pdf, p. 9) This narrative is perpetuated by family and others to dismiss his claims. (1Politie.doc.pdf, p. 1)

3. Alleged High-Level Political and Royal Complicity

Royal Involvement: Smedema alleges a "secret 'Royal Special Decree'" issued by "Queen Juliana around 1972/73" to grant immunity to those involved and make the case a state secret. (The Smedema Affair: Dutch Injustice in Spain, p. 4; Bizar misdrijf & politieke samenzwering!, p. 3) King Willem-Alexander is also alleged to have personally blocked Smedema's US asylum offer in 2017 while serving as a co-pilot, driven by "panic after President Obama supposedly filed a UNCAT complaint against the Netherlands around January 2017." (The Smedema Affair: Dutch Injustice in Spain, p. 4; Timeline Crucial Criminal Events! – Hans Smedema Affair.pdf, p. 2)
Joris Demmink: The former Secretary General of the Ministry of Justice, Joris Demmink, is alleged to be a central figure in the cover-up, described as a "highly criminal mole within the Ministry of Justice with secret Royal protection!" and accused of being a "rapist." (Probeerde Koning WA mij heimelijk via gratieverzoek te helpen? - Hans Smedema Affair, p. 1; Obstruction as Violation: The Kafkaesque Trap, p. 1) Demmink is also linked to a "large pedophile network in The Hague" involving "many more high-ranking officials and politicians." (DeDemminkDoofpot-webversie.pdf, p. 1)
State Security Justification: The cover-up and data deletion are allegedly justified under "state security," a claim Smedema argues can only be true if the Queen and high-level officials are involved. (CATComplaint-FormWebversie.pdf, p. 5; Gmail - DOJ-EOIR FOIA Request # 2025-05132-combined.pdf, p. 2)
Manipulation of Justice System: Allegations include "structural appointments of homosexuals, sanctioning of errors and offenses committed within justice and of class justice, the introduction of the phenomenon 'judge change' and the introduction - as well as the over-loyal implementation - of the European Arrest Warrant" under Demmink's tenure. (DeDemminkDoofpot-webversie.pdf, p. 2)

4. International Dimensions and Denial of Justice Abroad

US Asylum Attempts: Smedema's multiple asylum applications in the US (2009, 2013/14, 2016/17) were allegedly blocked by Dutch influence, despite US FBI/CIA investigations reportedly confirming aspects of his claims and Judge Rex J. Ford finding "5 good grounds for asylum" in 2009. (The Smedema Affair: Dutch Injustice in Spain, p. 4; NilsMelzerOHCHRsigned.pdf, p. 2)
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR): Smedema's 2006 ECHR complaint was rejected for "failure to satisfy the requirements mentioned in Articles 34 and 35 of the Treaty," specifically "not enough legal done inside the Netherlands!" (CATComplaint-FormWebversie.pdf, p. 4) Smedema argues this is impossible given the alleged state obstruction of legal aid and evidence. (CATComplaint-FormWebversie.pdf, p. 4; EU Ombudsman Complaint Hans Smedema Affair.pdf, p. 2)
United Nations Convention Against Torture (UNCAT): The Netherlands has allegedly "refused for 24 years to use the UNCAT rules for investigation," despite it being a state obligation. (ECHRcomplaintGemini.pdf, p. 1; The Smedema Affair: Dutch Injustice in Spain, p. 4) Smedema claims a UNCAT case against the Netherlands was initiated by President Obama in January 2017, likely through a non-public UNHRC procedure. (WOO Verzoek Ministerie Justitie Documenten met Landsadvocaat sinds 1 jan 2017 Hans Smedema Affair en UNCAT case UNHRC - Hans Smedema Affair, p. 2)
International Obstruction: The Dutch government is accused of using international relationships and treaties, such as a bilateral judicial treaty with the US, to obstruct Smedema's pursuit of justice and prevent international scrutiny. (Smedema's Allegations of Dutch Government Obstruction of Justice - Hans Smedema Affair, p. 1)

5. Media Suppression and Lack of Public Awareness

Media Blackout: Smedema expresses frustration with the lack of media coverage, alleging that media outlets are "either complicit in the cover-up or afraid to report on a story that implicates powerful figures." (Smedema's Allegations: Mind Control, Institutional Abuse, and Collateral Damage in the Netherlands - Hans Smedema Affair, p. 1) A "complete media-blackout was imposed over the case-Demmink" in 2007, with journalists reportedly receiving threats. (DeDemminkDoofpot-webversie.pdf, p. 3) This lack of attention allegedly allows the crimes to continue unchecked. (Smedema's Allegations: Mind Control, Institutional Abuse, and Collateral Damage in the Netherlands - Hans Smedema Affair, p. 1)

Key Takeaways

Allegations of State-Sanctioned Impunity: The core claim is that the Dutch state, through its various organs and high-ranking individuals, has actively orchestrated and maintained a decades-long cover-up of severe human rights abuses and crimes, granting de facto impunity to perpetrators.
Systemic Failure of Justice and Oversight Mechanisms: The narrative critically questions the effectiveness and impartiality of Dutch legal and oversight bodies (police, Ministry of Justice, Ombudsman, courts) when faced with allegations involving state actors, suggesting these mechanisms are compromised or actively subverted.
The "Obstruction as Violation" Argument: Smedema's strategic framing is that the continuous and deliberate obstruction of his attempts to seek justice is the violation of his fundamental rights, rather than merely a procedural impediment. This makes conventional legal remedies impossible and highlights a potential gap in the existing oversight frameworks.
International Implications: The alleged extension of Dutch obstruction to international legal and asylum processes raises significant concerns about the Netherlands' adherence to international human rights obligations and its impact on mutual trust among nations.
Urgency of Independent Investigation: The sheer scale, duration, and high-level involvement alleged in the Smedema affair, coupled with the claim of ongoing torture and inhuman treatment, underscore the critical need for a truly independent and comprehensive investigation to verify or refute these claims and address potential systemic failures.

[caption id="attachment_38481" align="alignright" width="100"]

Blog Content[/caption]

Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,

based on the legal-written-statements on this Blog-Dossier by victim Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile since 2008 surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain